Clinical Correlations – Final Reflection

When reflecting on Clinical Correlations from start to finish, I can see there has been a change in how I think. In the beginning, I remember feeling a sense of being lost. It was challenging to me since I was unsure what should be done in the presented cases, and my thought process was lacking organization. However, as the sessions went on, I started to get a grasp on how providers should think when evaluating their patients, what should be focused on, as well as what are red flags that require immediate action. I believe that I learned how to better obtain a patient history, as well as focus on what will be pertinent in treating the patients.

I feel that as a whole, my Clinical Correlations group has gotten stronger in our interview skills and formation of differentials. I think our approaches vary sometimes, but it seems like that is the reality in medicine, where different clinicians will have their own thought processes and preferences in workflow. There are group members who have natural authority and confidence when they speak; which is something I would like to work towards.

In the clinical year, I will need to continue developing my interview skills and organization of thoughts. It will be another challenge since I will have to apply my knowledge from didactic year, and use it to treat real patients! Additionally, there will be the variables of establishing rapport with patients, working with new people, and dealing with real-life timing and medical events.

For the future Clinical Correlations groups, I think its helpful for them to continue getting the at-home assignments. The prompts required us to utilize different resources, and expand our medical curiosity and knowledge. I also liked when the professors would ask us questions regarding treatment plan, and go around the room so everyone contributes to the conversation. Another “pro” was when our professors would share their personal experiences in medicine. These antidotes helped bring real-life medicine into the classroom. As for the future groups, I would like to encourage them to try to get the most out of this class. We are given a unique opportunity to learn from different clinicians, who each have their own experiences, stories, strengths, and practice!

Health Policy Brief

To: New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio
From: Melinda Chen Chiu, PA-S
Date: January 16, 2019
Re: Federal Mandate to Stop Plastic Waste

Problem Statement

Plastic is part of our daily lives, yet not many people know about the dire consequences these materials have on our environment, and ultimately our health. As one of the top cities in the world, we need to be leaders. Currently, our city only recycles 17% of our waste, meaning the rest ends up in our landfills or as litter (1).

Background

Plastic is being used everywhere.

    • It is cheap to produce, versatile, and oftentimes overly used in order for convenience.
    • According to the Earth Policy Institute, close to a million single-use plastic bags are used every minute, which adds up to nearly a trillion per year. (2)
    • Over half a billion plastic straws are used per day. (3)
    • Nearly half a trillion plastic cups are used a year. (3)

According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, plastic will never decompose. (4)

    • It is estimated that there are 269,000 tons of plastic in the ocean. They will degrade, meaning it will be continuously broken into smaller pieces, and ultimately become “microplastics” (5, 4).
    • Microplastics have the ability to absorb toxins. These plastic pieces end up in our consumed seafood, as well as drinking water (6).

Plastics result in economic and health consequences.

    • Over $8.2 billion worth of plastic materials is wasted due to failing to recycle. (7)
    • There is an estimated 269,000 tons of plastic in our oceans. This amount is expected to increase ten-fold by 2020, with 8 million metric tons added each year. (5, 8)
    • A study published by The Lancet in 2016 researched endocrine-disrupting chemicals (e.g. BPA and phthalates), which are commonly found in plastics. These chemicals are linked with health issues including hormone disruption, calorie metabolism issues, neurological and behavioral issues, birth defects, and cancer. US spends an estimated $340 billions of health care and disability costs related to these endocrine-disrupting chemicals. (9)
    • A study conducted by the CDC of 2517 urine samples (from a representative group of US subjects from the age of 6 and up) found BPA in 93% of the samples. (10).
    • Phthalates and BPA, which may be found in plastic food wrap and plastic containers, may transfer onto the food contents, and ultimately be consumed (11).

Landscape

Greenpeace organization

    • They work to spread awareness and call out companies to replace plastic products with sustainable alternatives. In 2018, they organized 239 plastic clean up events and brand audits across 42 countries. It was discovered that that the top three brands found in the plastic pollution collection were Coca-Cola, PepsiCo and Nestlé. (12)

 Companies that manufacture and use plastic

    • Dow Chemical, one of the leading plastic manufacturing companies, is joining in on preventing plastic waste in oceans and recycling. They helped start the Alliance to End Plastic Waste to find resolutions to managing plastic waste and recycling. They have started 55 cleanup efforts around the globe, and are working to make plastics that are recyclable. (13)
    • Coca-Cola, a large contributor to the plastic pollution issue, currently makes 100% recyclable bottles, but they are not made from 100% recycled materials. They believe that one of the most impactful ways to recover plastics is by households recycling, recommending increasing public awareness and information about how to recycle. (12, 14)
    • Switching from plastic to glass bottles can lead to rise of costs for the producer and consumers. Transporting glass comes with more risk of breakage and a heavier transportation load, which leads to more CO2 It is estimated that the transportation costs can rise up to 5 times per bottle with this switch. (15)
    • Studies show that plastic wrapping helps to reduce food waste by expanding shelf life. For example, individual packing of grapes can reduce 75% of its waste, and beef with vacuum packed plastic can last up to 45 days. (15)

Ocean conservationists, Fishermen, and Community members

    • Plastics have been found in stomachs of sea animals that live 7 miles-deep in the sea. (16)
    • Sea creatures mistake plastic as food and ingest them. They can get poisoned and/or have their intestinal system clogged by them, causing starvation and death. This plastic pollution is one of the reasons for the depletion of fish caught by fishermen. (16, 17)
    • Plastics ingested by sea creatures make their way up the food chain, and ultimately into our food. Plastics can negatively impact our health by causing cancer, respiratory, cardiovascular, pregnancy, gastrointestinal issues, etc. (18, 17)

Options

    • Enforce a ban for establishments and companies from selling and distributing one-time use plastic items. These will include plastic bags, cups, utensils, plastic wrapping, etc.
      • Advantages: This will prevent plastic waste from continuing to collect in our city. It will also stimulate innovations on finding plastic alternatives. For example, items that typically require packaging (e.g. saran wrap) may get a non-toxic biodegradable alternative wrap instead. Another example may be that businesses will start to sell and distribute biodegradable items (e.g. utensils and bags).
      • Disadvantages: Compliance for the ban may be difficult to enforce. Technology and materials to make viable alternatives to plastic may not be on the market yet.
    • Place a tax on items that are made of plastic or uses it in its packaging. Then offer incentives to save money by properly recycling plastic.
      • Advantages: This tax may discourage consumers from purchasing plastic-included products and seek other alternatives. Also, money saving incentives may influence people to recycle more.
      • Disadvantages: This would allow the continued purchase and use of plastic. People may still gravitate towards using these products out of habit and convenience.
    • Allocate funds to educate NYC on plastic pollution, and proper recycling techniques. Part of those funds for this project will come from the implementation and enforcement fees from individual’s failure to recycle.
      • Advantages: Educating NYC about plastic pollution may make people more conscious of their choices. Also getting proper instructions on recycling techniques will eliminate confusion and increase confidence in recycling. The threat of getting fees for failing to recycle will discourage people from littering and choosing not to recycle.
      • Disadvantages: There may be difficulties in methods for reaching out and educating every person in NYC. People may also not be affected by noncompliance fees if the amount owed is too low. This plan would also allow for the continued purchase and use of plastic.

Policy Recommendation

With the amount of plastic used every second of the day, this consumption needs to be halted promptly. Instituting and enforcing a ban for establishments and companies from selling and distributing one-time use plastic items is the most effective step for New Yorkers to counter this issue. It will cease plastic waste from continuing to collect in our city, and allow us to be leaders for innovation.

Although our current technology and materials to make alternatives to plastic may not be available on the market yet, this new demand will inevitably lead to the invention of sustainable, non-toxic, biodegradable alternatives to plastic. To ensure compliance, the city can be given a notice of this ban a year in advance, in order to use up the rest of their plastic supplies and to seek other alternatives. Measures can also be taken to stop the shipment of these plastic materials into our city.

This change will be our stride towards the goal of improving our city, state, nation, and world’s health. This ban will be for the benefit of our future, and generations to come. It will help lower healthcare costs, improve the safety in materials used in our society, and reduce the amount of toxins and waste consumed in our food.

References

    1. https://www.grownyc.org/recycling/facts
    2. http://www.earth-policy.org/press_room/C68/plastic_bags_fact_sheet
    3. https://www.earthday.org/2018/04/18/fact-sheet-how-much-disposable-plastic-we-use/
    4. https://marinedebris.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/Gen_Plastic_9-20-11%281%29.pdf
    5. https://www.nrdc.org/experts/peter-lehner/fast-food-trash-nation-time-cut-down-packaging-waste
    6. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969718330663
    7. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/59a706d4f5e2319b70240ef9/t/5a7e426ff9619ab1a90b004d/1518223990918/REPORT-2012-UnfinishedBusiness_TheCaseforEPR.pdf
    8. https://www.earthday.org/2018/04/05/fact-sheet-plastics-in-the-ocean/
    9. https://www.voanews.com/a/everyday-chemicals-cost-us-billions-in-health-care-disability/3555700.html
    10. https://www.niehs.nih.gov/health/topics/agents/sya-bpa/index.cfm
    11. https://www.health.harvard.edu/staying-healthy/microwaving-food-in-plastic-dangerous-or-not
    12. https://www.greenpeace.org/international/story/18876/these-10-companies-are-flooding-the-planet-with-throwaway-plastic/
    13. https://www.apnews.com/fe8eea1b31a14b8eaa899dc38bbb7e0f
    14. http://data.parliament.uk/WrittenEvidence/CommitteeEvidence.svc/EvidenceDocument/Environmental%20Audit/Packaging/written/70675.html
    15. http://www.bbc.com/capital/story/20180705-whats-the-real-price-of-getting-rid-of-plastic-packaging
    16. https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-02-04-plastic-pollution-is-threatening-fish-populations.html
    17. http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/environment/brief/oceans
    18. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321906991_Toxic_effects_of_plastic_on_human_health_and_environment_A_consequences_of_health_risk_assessment_in_Bangladesh

HPDP Case Study

Melinda Chiu
HPPA 512 – HPDP

Case Study of Mr. Barry Anderson

Immunizations

Although Mr. Anderson stated that he received “a bunch of shots from a free clinic” last year, we are unsure which ones, or if he is reliable about actually seeking medical care. It would be safer to give him these immunizations:

    • Td should be given since he mostly lives on the streets, and may use dirty needles with his heroin use.
    • PPSV23 vaccine should be given because he is a smoker.
    • Influenza vaccine should be given because it is November and the beginning of the flu season.
    • Zoster, Meningococcal ACWY, and Meningococcal B vaccines should be given because he is MSM, which is an indication.
    • He does not need Tdap, MMR, Varicella, Hep A, Hep B, HPV, and Hib because they are childhood vaccines. He does not need PCV13, because there should be a year between that and PPSV23.

Screening

 

    • For this single visit, I would perform a Rapid HIV test. If he is positive for HIV, I would educate him about the dangers of it, that there is a confirmatory test that can be done, and if positive he should be given treatments to lower his viral load.
    • I would also screen for alcohol misuse, tobacco use, and depression (see brief intervention).
    • Anderson’s blood pressure is normal. I would inquire if there is any family history of cardiovascular disease. If not, I would not need to check further for HTN this visit. I also would not need to screen for obesity because he is underweight with a BMI for 15.8.
    • For Mr. Anderson’s lifestyle, I would typically want to screen for Tuberculosis, Hepatitis B and C infection, Syphilis, Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, and Herpes, but I would mostly likely be unable to get the results within this single visit.

Health Promotion/Disease Prevention

 

    • Injury Prevention
      • Using condoms with all sexual acts
      • Avoid using his used needles because they may be dirty or rusty
      • Be aware of bed bugs (and street animals) to ensure a safe sleep environment
      • Look both ways before he crosses the street
      • If he gets behind the wheel, make sure to use a seat belt, and not be under the influence of alcohol or drugs
      • If he owns firearms he should conceal them and not let them be easily assessable
    • Diet
      • I would make Mr. Anderson aware that he is underweight and let him know the risks that can come with it, such as malnutrition, decreased immune function, anemia, and osteoporosis. I would encourage him to try to eat more frequently, and make healthy choices that contain more nutrients and vitamins.
    • Exercise
      • Anderson did not disclose much about his physical activity, but I would assess his ability to perform exercises, and/or his physical restrictions. If he is mostly sedentary I would ask him to try to exercise a few minutes daily, gradually increase, and eventually work up to 150 minutes per week. I could suggest him to walk around more, job around, or utilize park gyms. I would also let him know that with increased physical activity, he may be able to work up a better appetite to eat, and gain weight.
    • Harm Reduction
      • Utilize the buddy system when using heroin
      • Be strict with using the needles from needle exchange program one time
      • Make him aware of heroin overdose protection programs in the area
      • Make healthy choices when getting fast food
      • Nicotine gum/lozenges

Brief Intervention

Smoking Cessation

    • “What do you smoke, and how much?” According to his reporting he smokes upwards of 5 cigarettes a day, which is ¼ of a pack. Assuming he has been “bumming them on the street” for 7 years (becoming homeless around age 23, and now currently 30), he has about 2 pack year smoking history.
    • “Are you aware of what cigarettes can do to your health?” If he if unaware and willing to learn, I would let him know it can increase his risks of cancers, respiratory issues, bad breath, damaged teeth, and death. Also let him know it may be contributing to his weight loss and irritating the chronic cough he is experiencing.
    • “Have you thought about quitting smoking?” “After you wake up in the morning, about how long after that do you take your first smoke?”
    • “We can work together to help you quit. Would you be able to set a ‘quit date’? Have you considered nicotine alternatives like gums or lozenges?”
    • “Quitting smoking can improve your health and save your money, because continuing the habit may get you hooked and start to buy packs for yourself” “Would you be interested in having a support group to go to?” “Can I schedule a follow-up date so we can talk about your progress made?”

Substance Use

It is especially important to ask these questions because I suspect that Mr. Anderson lost his job and apartment due to drug and alcohol use.

    • “Do you drink alcohol? What do you drink? How many drinks would you say you have per week?” Mr. Anderson did not specify what he drinks and how much a week, but if I pressed him to tell me more, and he admits he drinks 5 or more drinks a day, I would try to counseling him more aggressively because he falls in the risky use group.
    • I would ask him CAGE questions to get an idea if there is any alcohol abuse.

“Have you felt the need to cut back on your drinking”
“Have people commented or criticized your drinking, and you get annoyed at them?”
“Do you ever experience feeling guilty from your drinking?”
“Do you ever drink in the morning in order to stop shaking or recover from a hangover?”

If he responds to one of these questions positively, I would think he was at an increased risk. If he responded positively to two or more, I would think he is an alcohol problem and is at risk of abuse and addition.

    • If he got a positive result on the CAGE questions, I would conduct the AUDIT questionnaire, skipping some that repeated the CAGE questions.

“How often do you have a drink containing alcohol?”
“How many drinks containing alcohol do you typically have when you drink?”
“How often do you have 6+ drinks per session?”
“How often during the past year did you find yourself unable to stop drinking?”
“How often during the past year did you forget or skip something because of drinking?”
“How often during the past year did you need to drink in the morning in order to stop shaking or recover from a hangover?”
“How often during the last year did you feel guilt from drinking?”
“How often during the last year did you forget what happened because of your drinking?”
“Have you or someone else been injured due to your drinking?”
“Has anyone expressed concern or suggested you to cut down on your drinking?”

Then I would calculate based on the AUDIT scoring system to see if I need to offer alcohol education, give advice, brief monitoring, and/or refer to a specialist or treatment.

    • “Do you ever mix alcohol with your heroin use?”
    • “Have you ever been drinking or using behind the wheel of a car?”
    • “Besides heroin, do you do any other drugs?” I could also conduct the NIDA questionnaire.

“In the past year, how many times did you use alcohol, tobacco products, prescription drugs for recreational use, illegal drugs?”

If he says he has used any of these within the past year I would question further.

“In your lifetime, have you used cannabis, cocaine, prescription stimulants or opiods for recreational use, methamphetamine, inhalants, sedatives or sleeping pills, hallucinogens, street opioids, or other things”

If he says he has used any of these in his life, I would question further.

“In the past 3 months, how often did you use the substances mentioned before?”
“How often do you have the strong urge to use each drug?”
“How often does the usage of each drug lead to health, social, legal, or financial issues?”
“How often did you forget or skip something because of use of each drug?”
“Has anyone expressed concern or suggested you to cut down on your use of each drug?”
“Have you ever tried and failed to control, cut down or stop using each drug?”

According to the NIDA scoring system, I would assess the risk level of Mr. Anderson and conduct the respective recommendations.

“Have you ever used drugs by injection?”

Including an HIV test, I would recommend Hep B and C testing.

    • “I would advise you to try to slowly lessen using these substances because they will have a negative impact on your health. Alcohol could lead to alcoholic hepatitis, liver cirrhosis, GERD, seizures, heart issues, and pancreas issues. Injecting drugs can lead to skin, joint, heart, and lung problems. They can be an opportunity to expose you to greater risk of infections. Also, alcohol and drugs may be another reason contributing to your weight loss.”
    • “Have you thought about stopping drinking alcohol or using drugs?” “Have you tried cutting down on them in the past? What were some obstacles you came across?”
    • I would counsel him against maladaptive thinking.
    • “We can work together to help you quit. We can set a goal of how much you can cut down on your use of these substances if you would like? Would you be interested in having a support group to go to? Can I schedule a follow-up date so we can talk about your progress made?”

Depression screening

    • This is important to do because people who drink alcohol and use drugs may be dealing with mental health issues. I would ask him if in the past two months did he, 1) experience little interest or pleasure in doing is usual activities, and 2) feel down, depressed, hopeless?
    • If he agrees to the above questions, I may ask him further if he has suicidal ideations, anxiety, OCD, if he has ever seen a mental health professional. I would assess his situation and maybe let him know about the option of calling 311, or give him some referrals to mental health professionals.

Issues to Address:

    1. I would address his drug, cigarette, and alcohol uses first, and educate him of the harms that may come with it.
    2. Then I would counsel him on safe sex practices, educate on sexual diseases that may be risks for his lifestyle, and perform a Rapid HIV test.
    3. After, I would give the vaccinations.
    4. I would screen for depression, encourage him to exercise more, and give advice on harm reduction, along with how to have a better diet and prevent injuries.
    5. Finally, I would stress to him the importance of regularly being seen by a clinician, and ask if he would like to schedule an appointment to come back if a month to follow up.

Fall 2018 vs. Spring 2019 H&P Reflection

  1. What differences do you note between the two H&Ps?
    When comparing the earlier H&P to the more recent H&P, I noticed that within roughly the same amount of time given to work with the patients, I was able to cover more ground in the latter. I also can see how far I have come in terms of what I have learned in performing physical exams.
  1. In what ways has your history-taking improved?  Are you eliciting all the important information?
    My history-taking has improved by me being able to better draw information from the patient, and understanding what information is considered “pertinent.” This may be attributed to the interviewing skills and knowledge I have learned in class, and picked up along my hospital visits. Also, I gained more confidence and comfort with working with patients.
  1. In what ways has writing an HPI improved?
    I believe that my HPI has improved in terms of thoroughness. I am better able to appreciate what parts of the HPI are more pertinent to cover and ask, according to different conditions and scenarios.
  1. What is your self-assessment of your current skill in performing a physical exam? Which areas do you feel strongest about/weakest about?
    I believe that I have come a long way from where I started with knowledge on performing PEs. I am more comfortable with interacting and “touching” patients. I believe that I have a good grasp on what a routine PE entails, and understand situations where more in depth exams are warranted. The area that needs improvement, more experience, and comfort, would be performing exams on the more private regions of the body.
  1. Which of the specific areas will you target as needing particular focus in future patient visits when you start the clinical year?
    In clinical year, I could use more practice in performing PEs in order to gain more knowledge and experience in medicine. I also look forward to learning more from the remainder of the didactic semesters in order to better form assessments and plans for my future patients.

Final Ethics Reflection on My Drive to Become a PA

Melinda Chiu
12/11/2018
HPPA 514

Reflection Essay

In this piece, I will explain how I got my drive to become a PA, what I anticipate will be important aspects of my practice, and describe and explain how certain ethical principles play a part in the aspects I foresee.

In my junior year of high school, my father was diagnosed with liver cancer, and lost his battle with it a few months after. As I mourned my family’s loss, I had a chance to reflect on how my father’s medical team offered such a strong support network to my family throughout. I found myself looking up to every member, which aspired me to work towards becoming a PA. As I gathered more health experiences, my love for medicine grew. The PAs I met along the way were very knowledgeable, professional, enthusiastic about their profession, and formed strong relationships with their patients. My goal was repeatedly being affirmed, and I quickly realized my passion for becoming a PA was to make a difference; by giving back to the medical community, and to be able to treat and comfort patients and their families.

In my experience, knowing that clinicians and other healthcare staff truly cared for me and my family helped to decrease some stress and anxiety. I anticipate that in my practice, one of the most important aspects will be to understand my patients and their family’s healthcare expectations and beliefs. By spending time with them, I would be able to get to know them as individuals, and show that I care about them. By gaining their trust, it will only strengthen my ability to help and treat them. Another aspect that I find important is being able to volunteer. A PA I had come in contact with shared how she regularly volunteered to offer her medical services at sporting events. I was in awe of her selflessness, and the ability of PAs being able to help. Also, from knowing US is relatively advanced in medicine, I want to be able to travel to underserved countries to extend my services.

A key aspect for carrying out my vision is by forming strong relationships with my patients. I believe that the ethical principles of dignity, truthfulness, and beneficence will best support this in my practice. In the RCN report, treating patients with dignity was “to treat them as being of worth, in a way that is respectful of them as valued individuals”(1-pg8). This definition shows how it is essential to spend time to understand the patients on an individual level in order to build rapport, better treat them, and promote their dignity. Especially when I continue to serve patients in my practice or in volunteering, I will be faced with new cultures, values, and ways of living. Being aware and sensitive to this fact is essential. Ways to address this may be to respect patient’s space, explain and ask for permission for what I plan do in examinations, use caution when needing to expose body parts, and have compassion. Another important practice would be to learn about the patient’s preferences for disclosure; for example, if they want to be alone, with family or friends, nor not told much at all. This aspect ties in with the ethical principle of truthfulness.

In the Surbone article, truth-telling is described as “a dynamic, iterative, and interactive process that takes place between the [provider] and the patient, sharing many provisional truths in view of a common therapeutic goal(2-pg947). This explains how there should be a relationship where the patient’s goals, values, and cultural customs are appreciated by the provider. According to this mutual understanding, it will guide how “truthfulness” is shared. For example, cultures have different beliefs surrounding news of cancer. Some cultures believe that patients should know their diagnosis, while others may not disclose(2-pg946)(3-pg505-508). Beneficence can be seen on both sides of this scenario. It is defined as “caring about and for the well-being of patients, and working towards good of patient”(4-pg103). One culture may believe that the patient should be told the truth in order to make an informed decision for their next steps; while another culture may see that not disclosing the truth will protect the patient from unnecessary stress, and their clinician and/or loved ones should make decisions on their behalf(2-pg946). By spending time unpacking the patient’s expectations and preferences in health situations, I would be able tailor my methods to better care for and respect my patient’s wishes.

By practicing the ethical principles of dignity, truthfulness, and beneficence, I will be able to make a difference by better understanding my patients, and enhancing my services abroad.

References

    1. Royal College of Nursing. (2008). Defending Dignity
    2. Surbone, A. (2006). Telling the truth to patients with cancer: what is the truth?
    3. Tuckett, A. (2004). Truth-Telling in Clinical Practice and the Arguments For and Against
    4. Yeo et al. (2010). Concepts and Cases in Nursing Ethics – Beneficence

Balancing Autonomy and Beneficence in Healthcare

Melinda Chiu
October 2, 2018
HPPA 514 – Biomedical Ethics

In healthcare, oftentimes ethics in considering treatments come into question. In this scenario, Mr. S asks for a prescription for Viagra despite an unremarkable physical exam and denial of sexual issues. Ultimately, the physician agreed to give the prescription. In this thesis I will use the principles of autonomy and beneficence to support my position in agreement with the provider.

Autonomy is defined as “the right [of the patient] to make independent decisions concerning one’s own life and well-being”(1) and “respect[ing] a patient’s moral personhood by honoring [their] carefully deliberated preferences”(2). Essentially, it is to let a patient consider what they want for their own treatment. Yeo et al.’s description of autonomy as “free action” supports this thesis. The patient voluntarily made the decision that he wanted Viagra, which is an aspect that ties into the patient giving informed consent, and respects patient autonomy(1). The patient did not express distress from pressures from his wife nor friend, nor did the provider offer this option. The only possible sources of persuasion could be from his perception of societal standards or expectations from the adult-film industry; however, these possibilities do not directly coerce the patient. Refusing to prescribe the medication would disregard the right of the patient to make his choice. He had his own desire to feel more masculine, hence, seeking for Viagra. Although he denied sexual dysfunction, there is a possibility of him feeling uncomfortable to disclose this issue. “Effective deliberation” in autonomy is another description that supports the thesis. This explains how the patient was able to express his desired goal of getting Viagra, with reasoning to “feel ‘more of a man”.” “Competence” is a concept that went hand-in-hand with effective deliberation, where a patient would need the mental capacity to make choices. According to the physician’s exam, it showed normal findings and had no remarks indicating that the patient was unable to make decisions for himself. Examining the concepts of free action, voluntary choice, effective deliberation, and competence under autonomy helps to support the thesis. The principle of beneficence also works in conjunction with autonomy.

Beneficence in healthcare is an ideology that describes “caring about and for the wellbeing of” patients, and the “orientation toward the good of patients”(3). In other words, it is a way of intentionally treating patients with actions that emphasize benefiting them and their outcomes. Even if some outcomes inevitably result in risk, beneficence will lean towards choices that produce more “good” than harm to the patient and/or others. In the case with our patient wanting Viagra, beneficence supports the physician. This is because the medication will not affect others negatively, and the physician predicted low-risk to the patient. One might argue that Viagra may harm the patient with side-effects, or mentally, if it does not meet his desired outcome, and therefore he should not be given the medication. This stance can be countered by the concept of “dignity of risk.” This idea explains that a person should have the dignity to be in command of assessing risks of what they desire, act on pursuing it, and be subject to consequences that may follow(2). In other words, although the patient’s choice may have risks, their choice should be respected. Another facet of considering treatment with beneficence places importance on the quality and sanctity of life(3). These ideas evaluate how a treatment is able to improve one’s life, and views that everyone’s needs and concerns should be given the same consideration and respect as everyone else’s. The patient wanted to improve his self image of masculinity, and believed that Viagra could help. The medication has the potential to improve his “quality of life” in this way. His concern is not far off from a patient wanting cosmetic surgery (e.g. breast augmentation), even though their condition is not life-threatening nor affects their physical health. This case shows how a procedure can be considered based on a patient’s desire for it, as well as for benefiting their mental-state and self-image. After all, the World Health Organization had defined health as “a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being,” which shows that the concept of “health” is multifaceted and all parts should be considered(4). The ideas of producing more “good” than harm, dignity of risk, quality of life, and sanctity of life, and the broad definition of health support the physician in prescribing the medication.

With the principles of beneficence and autonomy, I have supported my argument in having the provider write the prescription for Mr. S.

References

    1. Yeo et al., Autonomy
    2. Kirk, Timothy W. “Staying at Home: Risk, Accommodation, and Ethics in Hospice Care.” Journal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing. 16, no. 4 2014: 200-205.
    3. Yeo et al., Beneficence
    4. World Health Organization. Constitution of WHO: principles, 2018, http://www.who.int/about/mission/en/. Accessed 30 September, 2018.